|
John Mason MP
|
|
Monday, 29 March 2010 |
Mason writes to police - Strathclyde must investigate Purcell
contacts
Glasgow's problems go beyond Purcell
Former Labour rising star Steven Purcell's interview in the Sun, 4
weeks after he resigned as leader of Glasgow City Council has left more
questions for Labour and the Council to answer said Glasgow East MP John
Mason and Council Opposition leader James Dornan as it emerged others
in the council were told of Cllr Purcell's drug use but took no action.
Mr Mason has repeated his call for a full independent investigation
into the council's dealings and has again written to the police
following confirmation of supply and use of illegal drugs and
confirmation by former Councillor Purcell that he was believed to be at
risk from blackmail.
The two also said that recent revelations over behaviour at Labour's
quangos in Glasgow, expenses, questions over contracts and concerns over
relations with Labour party donors showed the Labour run council faced
questions going far beyond Steven Purcell.
In the interview The Sun says Purcell "suffered the emotional breakdown
amid fears gangsters had a video of him snorting cocaine"
Following a visit by the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency
Purcell adds "I told close colleagues at the council about it because I
think it is important to be honest. They were happy for me to carry on -
with the strict condition it didn't happen again."
Glasgow East MP John Mason said: "There is no doubt Steven Purcell is
facing difficult personal problems and I hope everyone will give him the
time to recover, but his interview has left more questions than answers
for the rest of Glasgow Labour.
"Strathclyde Police must now investigate who Mr Purcell was in contact
with and if the council or any individuals were exposed to undue
influence at any point. I am writing again to the police to ask them to
investigate this matter.
"This interview confirms not simply that he used cocaine but had a very
real fear that gangsters had a video of him and could blackmail him.
"There are real questions over who he had been spending time with and
what they wanted with him that the police must investigate.
"This goes beyond the individual and brings in questions of propriety in
the council that are of genuine concern to my constituents.
"Continuing concerns in the newspapers over council contracts,
connections to city businessmen and now gangsters are legitimate points
that should be investigated."
Glasgow Opposition Leader James Dornan said: "Cllr Purcell's resignation
has simply exposed the cracks in Labour's façade.
"The questions facing the Labour administration go well beyond Steven
Purcell's personal situation.
"The council and the Labour party must tell us who was told about the
SCDEA visit, who knew that Steven Purcell was taking drugs and on what
grounds did they decide to take no further action.
"If Steven Purcell's council colleagues had acted properly he may have
had the opportunity to get help for his problems rather than face the
situation he and Glasgow are now in.
"As Scotland's largest authority with the largest mainland budget there
are billions of pounds that must be properly accounted for and it is
essential for Glasgow that we know council money is being spent properly
not lavished on champagne lifestyles and luxury lunches.
"This week councillors will have the opportunity to open the council up
to real scrutiny by voting with the SNP for a full statement and a full
investigation. If Labour are so sure there is nothing wrong then they
should have nothing to hide."
Note:
The motion for debate on Thursday reads:
'Council notes recent events concerning the former leadership of
the council, recognises that the lack of clarity over events at a
senior level risks damaging the reputation of Glasgow City Council, and
that public trust can only be restored by being open and honest about
what has happened. Council resolves that in order to move forward and
put these damaging events behind us, that a full statement is made by
the acting leader, that an independent investigation be undertaken into
the practices and recent decisions of the Council, that the findings be
published in full, and that lessons be learned from this process to
ensure such a situation cannot arise again in the future.'
|